John Hussman: Depression Fear Mongering 'Ridiculous'
Excerpt from the Hussman Funds' Weekly Market Comment (10/06/08):
I've updated our projections for 10-year S&P 500 total returns below (standard methodology). The heavy line tracks actual 10-year total returns. The green, orange, yellow, and red lines represent the projected total returns for the S&P 500 assuming terminal valuation multiples of 20, 14 (average), 11 (median) and 7 times normalized earnings. Current valuations place the most likely expectation for 10-year total returns in the 5-8% range for the S&P 500. That's not particularly high on a historical basis, but already exceeds the projection we had at the 2002 bear market lows, and is the "least bad" since 1995.
As long-term shareholders know, with the exception of 2003, I have considered stocks to be strenuously overvalued for many years. The unfortunate fact is that over the past decade, the S&P 500 has achieved a total return, including dividends, of just 2.45% annually. Since the 2000 market peak, the S&P 500 has performed even worse, achieving a loss of -2.23% annually, again including dividends. The reckless valuation of stocks has held us to a fully hedged investment stance for a much longer period than I would have imagined, but we place risk management and long-term returns ahead of "tracking the market" for short-term participation. Since the inception of the Strategic Growth Fund in 2000, we've generally refused to accept much market exposure, again with the notable exception of 2003, which was (pleasantly) the only year since 2000 that the S&P 500 achieved a total return in excess of 20%.
...
In regard to the legislation actually passed by Congress, one of the interesting improvements is that it includes various mandates (loss recovery, executive compensation limits) that are likely to discourage companies from actually using it, while still creating something of a "lender of the last resort" that will help to thaw the capital markets. As I've repeatedly noted, nearly all of these financials - even the distressed ones - have enough bondholder liabilities on the books that customers will be unharmed even if the companies go belly up. The issue has always been one of capital. As long as the capital cushion from shareholder equity is thin, investors have a tendency to pull money out, which forces institutions to sell assets at distressed prices. With the Treasury now a "last resort" buyer of those assets, my hope is that private investors will be more willing to provide capital. Almost certainly, there will be more dilution ahead for financial companies, so we may not observe a particularly extended rebound in that sector. But in any event, the general easing of concerns about another Great Depression should help the markets.
Frankly, I thought the drama and fear-mongering about another Great Depression was ridiculous in the first place. The same financial news anchors and Wall Street analysts that constantly gurgled about the market's resilience and strong fundamentals at the top, and all the way down, suddenly shifted to warning about Depression, economic meltdown, and bread lines - bread lines! - when they saw a big bucket of money that would only become available if the public was scared out of its gourd. Now you'll hear the same chatter until the Fed cuts rates again (which it almost has to do simply to maintain credibility, because the effective Fed Funds rate - which is hovering below 1% - is already so much lower than the 2% target). Call me cynical. This Depression talk is just outrageous - especially from people who didn't have the slightest sense that any of this was coming.
Related Articles
|
Top Rated Comment Streams:
-
1.Hedged In661
- 2.
-
3.Smarty_Pants400
-
4.cos1000307
-
5.axelrod608296




This article has 20 comments:
-
Zooey
-
784 Comments
Oct 06 01:49 PM-
basehitz
-
38 Comments
Oct 06 02:01 PM-
Simit Patel
-
30 Comments
My Website
Oct 06 03:33 PMHistory does indeed repeat itself.
-
curbs-in
-
418 Comments
Oct 06 03:49 PM"Faced by failure of credit, they have proposed only the lending of more money."
Or, "...they have resorted to exhortations, pleading tearfully for restored confidence."
Does any of this remind you of the Bush-Paulson plan?
Paragraph from FDR:
"True, they have tried. But their efforts have been cast in the pattern of an outworn tradition. Faced by failure of credit, they have proposed only the lending of more money. Stripped of the lure of profit by which to induce our people to follow their false leadership, they have resorted to exhortations, pleading tearfully for restored confidence. They only know the rules of a generation of self-seekers. They have no vision, and when there is no vision the people perish."
Complete Inaugural speech for FDR here, for those who are willing to listen to a voice from the past:
www.americanrhetoric.c...
www.americanrhetoric.c...
-
Jackson Cash
-
293 Comments
Oct 06 04:48 PMWhen people actually wake up and smell the coffee, perhaps we could deflate this monster and restart when value actually equals worth.
My favorite is those that think this stuff "goes away"...
-
moonbat1775
-
707 Comments
My Website
Oct 06 04:51 PMLudvig Von Mises predicted the Great Depression. Gotta any quotes form him?
-
Pent up demand
-
113 Comments
Oct 06 05:27 PMI think you're confusing your populist demagogues. It was Wilson and WWI :)
-
inthemoney
-
70 Comments
Oct 06 05:57 PMActully, I think today's panic felt like a bottom. It is not often you see individual stocks go down 15-20% 3 days in a row.
I bought some stocks in the morning just to see them another 10% down at lunch. And they were already 30-40% down from last week. They recovered toward the close on yet another rumor. But I was impressed with how strong the panic was. People were basically throwing stocks overboards like they were ballast on a sinking ship.
-
debtacid
-
115 Comments
Oct 06 06:50 PM-
debtacid
-
115 Comments
Oct 06 06:54 PM-
moonbat1775
-
707 Comments
My Website
Oct 06 07:50 PMYes, Wilson broke his promise about WWI but FDR broke his promise about WWII by provoking the Japanese and the Germans.
-
jan814
-
20 Comments
My Website
Oct 06 10:44 PM-
Lin
-
62 Comments
Oct 07 01:14 AM-
Lin
-
62 Comments
Oct 07 01:16 AM-
moonbat1775
-
707 Comments
My Website
Oct 07 05:45 AMAs long as we have nukes, no one is going to take anything by force. This is known as "the plutonium standard".
-
Mr.G
-
104 Comments
Oct 07 06:59 AM-
Pauly B
-
100 Comments
Oct 07 09:07 AMBy next October we should see 9-10 % unemployment and a box of cereal costing 6 bucks. Earnings are going to be pathetic in the coming quarters.
-
svkoho
-
99 Comments
My Website
Oct 07 11:37 AM-
SpazNetz
-
2 Comments
Oct 08 10:15 AM-
Muzie
-
103 Comments
Oct 17 09:04 PMSuch hypocrites.